Talk about Disinformation, Facebook “whistleblower” is fake

Fances Haugen - Facebook whistleblower

So, Frances Haugen is a “whistleblower” huh, how convenient that she all of a sudden has been thrust into the lime light and marched up to congress to hear her plea. Please! In addition to working for Facebook’s election interference team, Haugen is a Democrat party activist. She donated to Democrat politicians more than 30 times since 2016, including to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). Her most recent donation was to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) — the organization that works to elect the very people who invited her to testify.

As many have already said it, THIS IS A SET UP.  The Gateway Pundit has more of the story:

According to FOX News, Haugen has donated 37 times and given nearly $2,000 to Democrats and related PACs since 2016 while being employed at Facebook, Pinterest, and Gigster, according to Federal Election Commission records.

On Tuesday Facebook “whistleblower” and Democrat donor, Frances Haugen went before a Senate subcommittee this week two days after appearing on “60 Minutes” to push for more tech control of free speech as they see fit.

The former Facebook product manager on the civic misinformation team, appeared before a Senate subcommittee this week after claiming the company knew its products had harmful effects on users, specifically teen girls.

This Far-left Facebook “whistleblower” Frances Haugen, advised lawmakers to pass legislation that would empower the establishment media at the expense of independent creators, ironically worked for a unit at Facebook tasked with preventing “misinformation” around the 2020 election — the same group that would have been involved in censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.

It was called the “Civic Integrity Unit,” and as Haugen herself revealed, it was established just in time for the 2020 election, and wound down as soon as Biden won.

This unit, which was tasked with combating “disinformation” around the election, would almost certainly have been involved in the decision to suppress the New York Post’s story.