Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director James Comey said Tuesday at a press conference that he will not recommend an indictment against Hillary Clinton, though he found “evidence” that she might have violated laws pertaining to the handling of classified information.
Guess what America? There are 2 set of laws/rules now. One for the DC Elite and one for everyone else…. Here are more reactions:
Comey: “No direct evidence” Clinton was hacked by hostile actors but possible it happened.
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) July 5, 2016
Per Catherine Herridge: If you look at 18USC793 sub section F – gross negligence is gross negligence. No requirement of intent/willfulness.
— Brad Thor (@BradThor) July 5, 2016
“Extremely careless”
Classified at the time they were sent
May have been hacked
BUT:
“No reasonable prosecutor…”
— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) July 5, 2016
“Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”
TRANSLATION: She’s guilty but we won’t prosecute.
“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.”
TRANSLATION: If you did this, you would be in prison.
I am certainly more “never Hilary” than I am “not Trump.” This is disgusting. Next time I get pulled over I think I’ll just say the magic words, “no intentional” crime here.
Overview of email findings:
Total of 110 emails “in 52 email chains” were considered classified “at the time they were sent or received.”
8 “Top Secret” chains,
36 with “Secret” information
8 eight more that were “Confidential.”
Another 2,000 were classified “Confidential” later.